Hi Gerard,
As I said, I don't follow your arguments. Wikidata Query, for example, has also started without any qualifiers at all, and yet it was a useful tool from the beginning.
Your feedback is always welcome, but there is a point when critique is no longer constructive, and when it is best to "agree to disagree". I think we have reached that point.
Markus
On 13/06/14 12:37, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi, There is a huge difference between being complete and leaving out essential information. When you consider Ronald Reagan [1], it is essential information that he was a president of the USA and a governor of California. When you only make him an actor and a politician, the information you are left with gives the impression he is more relevant as an actor.
You brought attention to new functionality that is essentially broken. It does not give a fair impression of the Wikidata content. I have been arguing against overly referring to academic tools and standards. For me this announcement is yet another pointer that many of the tools are overrated and only have an "academic relevance. Thanks, GerardM
[1] http://tools.wmflabs.org/reasonator/?&q=9960
On 13 June 2014 11:41, Markus Krötzsch <markus@semantic-mediawiki.org mailto:markus@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
Hi Gerard, On 13/06/14 11:08, Gerard Meijssen wrote: Hoi, When you leave out qualifiers, you will find that Ronald Reagan was never president of the United States and only an actor. Yes, omitting the statements with qualifiers is wrong but as a consequence the total of the information is wrong as well. I do not see the point of this functionality. It is wrong any way I look at it. Without qualifiers information is wrong. Without statements information is wrong and without the items involved the information is incomplete and wrong. As I see it you cannot win. Including this type of RDF export produces something that I fail to see serves any purpose or it is the purpose that you can. Surely, Wikidata will never be complete. There will always be some statements missing. If we would follow your reasoning, the data would therefore never be of any use. I think this is a bit drastic. Anyway, why argue? If you don't like the simplified exports, just use the full ones. We clearly say that "simplified" is not "faithful", and we have a detailed documentation about what is in each of the files. So it does not seem likely that people will be confused. Best regards, Markus _________________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org> https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l