On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM Egon Willighagen egon.willighagen@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Lydia, all,
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Markus Krötzsch markus@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 05.03.2016 14:45, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
Give it another 2 to 3 weeks and it'll get there. More and more editors are exposed to the separation in the UI now and start noticing the ones that intuitively should be moved into the identifier section.
Ok, let's see what happens. I am not saying that the other criteria
applied
now in the discussions are bad. It's just another use of the datatype
than I
would have expected.
I'm one of the people who noticed the separation and indeed wondered why some of the chemistry-related identifiers I tagged and added in the long lists of identifiers were not included yet...
What is the exact process? Do you just plan to wait longer to see if anyone supports/contradicts my tagging? Should I get other Wikidata users and contributors to back up my suggestion?
Add them to the list Katie linked if you think they should be converted. We wait a bit to see if anyone disagrees and I also do a quick sanity check for each property myself before conversion.
Cheers Lydia