Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
Hi Oliver,
from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: the one Max just sent around: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307
We had one on diversity that also has a small section about representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf
Gruß, Fabian
On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes <okeyes@wikimedia.orgmailto:okeyes@wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Cheers, Fabian
-- Fabian Flöck Research Associate Computational Social Science department @GESIS Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 fabian.floeck@gesis.orgmailto:fabian.floeck@gesis.org
www.gesis.org www.facebook.com/gesis.org
Thanks both!
I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping of wikimedia content onto wikidata content.
On 8 April 2015 at 07:19, Flöck, Fabian Fabian.Floeck@gesis.org wrote:
Hi Oliver,
from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: the one Max just sent around: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307
We had one on diversity that also has a small section about representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf
Gruß, Fabian
On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Cheers, Fabian
-- Fabian Flöck Research Associate Computational Social Science department @GESIS Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 fabian.floeck@gesis.org
www.gesis.org www.facebook.com/gesis.org
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Dear Oliver,
On 04/08/2015 03:38 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
Thanks both!
I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping of wikimedia content onto wikidata content.
Oh, I didn't see it was Wikidata instead of Wikpedia.
Wikipedia research and tools: Review and comments. http://www2.compute.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pd...
contains pointers to the Max Klein/Piotr Konieczny studies and Magnus Manske's Mix’n’match (presently page 11). Magnus Manske has a blog post recently:
http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=278 "Sex and artists"
If I remember correctly wikidata-l had some discussion about that. Probably you know that already.
best Finn Årup Nielsen
On 8 April 2015 at 07:19, Flöck, Fabian Fabian.Floeck@gesis.org wrote:
Hi Oliver,
from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: the one Max just sent around: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307
We had one on diversity that also has a small section about representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf
Gruß, Fabian
On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Cheers, Fabian
-- Fabian Flöck Research Associate Computational Social Science department @GESIS Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 fabian.floeck@gesis.org
www.gesis.org www.facebook.com/gesis.org
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Perfect; thank you!
On 8 April 2015 at 09:53, Finn Årup Nielsen fn@imm.dtu.dk wrote:
Dear Oliver,
On 04/08/2015 03:38 PM, Oliver Keyes wrote:
Thanks both!
I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping of wikimedia content onto wikidata content.
Oh, I didn't see it was Wikidata instead of Wikpedia.
Wikipedia research and tools: Review and comments. http://www2.compute.dtu.dk/pubdb/views/edoc_download.php/6012/pdf/imm6012.pd...
contains pointers to the Max Klein/Piotr Konieczny studies and Magnus Manske's Mix’n’match (presently page 11). Magnus Manske has a blog post recently:
http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=278 "Sex and artists"
If I remember correctly wikidata-l had some discussion about that. Probably you know that already.
best Finn Årup Nielsen
On 8 April 2015 at 07:19, Flöck, Fabian Fabian.Floeck@gesis.org wrote:
Hi Oliver,
from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: the one Max just sent around: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307
We had one on diversity that also has a small section about representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf
Gruß, Fabian
On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Cheers, Fabian
-- Fabian Flöck Research Associate Computational Social Science department @GESIS Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 fabian.floeck@gesis.org
www.gesis.org www.facebook.com/gesis.org
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
-- Finn Årup Nielsen http://people.compute.dtu.dk/faan/
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org