My suggestion was to start with new iw links on Wikidata, which is Not a
random selection, but represent the last created on any versions, which
more represent the most asked for
Anders
Federico Leva (Nemo) skrev 2014-06-24 08:34:
Anders Wennersten, 24/06/2014 08:06:
below 500 ch
I assume you know of
https://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesArticlesGt500Bytes.htm
In the meanwhile I'll repeat myself ad nauseam: any approach based on
random selection of articles is useless for quality assessment,
because it's not representative of what people actually read on the wiki.
Nemo
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l