I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
Jeff Nickerson (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; Heather Ford (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on Thursday, April 30 (livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel (#wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities Jeff Nickerson Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures. Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate Heather Ford In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
A reminder that this event will start in 10 minutes. You can watch the event on YouTube here http://youtu.be/upQXecRNcdw. As usual, we will be in #wikimedia-research for questions and chat. :-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
*Jeff Nickerson* (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; *Heather Ford* (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on *Thursday, April 30 *(livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel ( #wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
*Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities**Jeff Nickerson*Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures.*Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate**Heather Ford*In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
That was fun :) Thanks so much for organising, Aaron, Dario, Leila.
I totally recommend participating in the showcase for those who haven't done it yet.
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 30 April 2015 at 19:18, Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org wrote:
A reminder that this event will start in 10 minutes. You can watch the event on YouTube here http://youtu.be/upQXecRNcdw. As usual, we will be in #wikimedia-research for questions and chat. :-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
*Jeff Nickerson* (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; *Heather Ford* (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on *Thursday, April 30 *(livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel (#wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
*Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities**Jeff Nickerson*Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures.*Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate**Heather Ford*In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
\o/ Glad to have you present. :)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Heather Ford hfordsa@gmail.com wrote:
That was fun :) Thanks so much for organising, Aaron, Dario, Leila.
I totally recommend participating in the showcase for those who haven't done it yet.
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 30 April 2015 at 19:18, Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org wrote:
A reminder that this event will start in 10 minutes. You can watch the event on YouTube here http://youtu.be/upQXecRNcdw. As usual, we will be in #wikimedia-research for questions and chat. :-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
*Jeff Nickerson* (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; *Heather Ford* (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on *Thursday, April 30 *(livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel (#wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
*Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities**Jeff Nickerson*Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures.*Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate**Heather Ford*In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Yes Heather it was very interesting - thanks for presenting your work. We need to think carefully about these issues moving forward and your work helps us frame discussion. Just this morning I received a newsletter from WMNL with a short interview of one of our more prominent chapter members who believes that in the future the role of the "casual editor" will decline in favor of more collaborations with external organisations. Though I believe we should work more with dedicated organizations doing the important work of documenting oral histories before stories "die out", the role of "casual editors" on Wikipedia, expert or not, will always remain important links between such projects and actual Wikipedia articles. The challenge has to do with the trust aspects of becoming a "reliable source" that such casual editors will be willing to use.
In the Netherlands we have such projects recording stories in dialect, and recording testimonials of WWII survivors.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com wrote:
\o/ Glad to have you present. :)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Heather Ford hfordsa@gmail.com wrote:
That was fun :) Thanks so much for organising, Aaron, Dario, Leila.
I totally recommend participating in the showcase for those who haven't done it yet.
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 30 April 2015 at 19:18, Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org wrote:
A reminder that this event will start in 10 minutes. You can watch the event on YouTube here http://youtu.be/upQXecRNcdw. As usual, we will be in #wikimedia-research for questions and chat. :-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
*Jeff Nickerson* (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; *Heather Ford* (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on *Thursday, April 30 *(livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel (#wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
*Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities**Jeff Nickerson*Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures.*Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate**Heather Ford*In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Thanks so much for your note, Jane! Totally agree with you that individual editors in their personal, volunteer capacity are critical actors for Wikipedia, Jane.
The big problem - at least with the projects I've seen in Africa - are that they are seriously under-funded. Strong organisations are going to be important to create content that Wikipedia misses, and it will be up to the WMF to work out to what extent they should be supported if this is deemed the appropriate way of widening the scope of knowledges represented.
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 30 April 2015 at 21:58, Jane Darnell jane023@gmail.com wrote:
Yes Heather it was very interesting - thanks for presenting your work. We need to think carefully about these issues moving forward and your work helps us frame discussion. Just this morning I received a newsletter from WMNL with a short interview of one of our more prominent chapter members who believes that in the future the role of the "casual editor" will decline in favor of more collaborations with external organisations. Though I believe we should work more with dedicated organizations doing the important work of documenting oral histories before stories "die out", the role of "casual editors" on Wikipedia, expert or not, will always remain important links between such projects and actual Wikipedia articles. The challenge has to do with the trust aspects of becoming a "reliable source" that such casual editors will be willing to use.
In the Netherlands we have such projects recording stories in dialect, and recording testimonials of WWII survivors.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Aaron Halfaker aaron.halfaker@gmail.com wrote:
\o/ Glad to have you present. :)
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Heather Ford hfordsa@gmail.com wrote:
That was fun :) Thanks so much for organising, Aaron, Dario, Leila.
I totally recommend participating in the showcase for those who haven't done it yet.
Best, Heather.
Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk Doctoral Programme http://hblog.org | @hfordsa http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa
On 30 April 2015 at 19:18, Leila Zia leila@wikimedia.org wrote:
A reminder that this event will start in 10 minutes. You can watch the event on YouTube here http://youtu.be/upQXecRNcdw. As usual, we will be in #wikimedia-research for questions and chat. :-)
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Dario Taraborelli < dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:
I am thrilled to announce our speaker lineup for this month’s research showcase https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Research_and_Data/Showcase#April_2015.
*Jeff Nickerson* (Stevens Institute of Technology) will talk about remix and reuse in collaborative communities; *Heather Ford* (Oxford Internet Institute) will present an overview of the oral citations debate in the English Wikipedia.
The showcase will be recorded and publicly streamed at 11.30 PT on *Thursday, April 30 *(livestream link will follow). We’ll hold a discussion and take questions from remote attendees via the Wikimedia Research IRC channel (#wikimedia-research http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikimedia-research on freenode) as usual.
Looking forward to seeing you there.
Dario
*Creating, remixing, and planning in open online communities**Jeff Nickerson*Paradoxically, users in remixing communities don’t remix very much. But an analysis of one remix community, Thingiverse, shows that those who actively remix end up producing work that is in turn more likely to remixed. What does this suggest about Wikipedia editing? Wikipedia allows more types of contribution, because creating and editing pages are done in a planning context: plans are discussed on particular loci, including project talk pages. Plans on project talk pages lead to both creation and editing; some editors specialize in making article changes and others, who tend to have more experience, focus on planning rather than acting. Contributions can happen at the level of the article and also at a series of meta levels. Some patterns of behavior – with respect to creating versus editing and acting versus planning – are likely to lead to more sustained engagement and to higher quality work. Experiments are proposed to test these conjectures.*Authority, power and culture on Wikipedia: The oral citations debate**Heather Ford*In 2011, Wikimedia Foundation Advisory Board member, Achal Prabhala was funded by the WMF to run a project called 'People are knowledge' or the Oral citations project https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Oral_Citations. The goal of the project was to respond to the dearth of published material about topics of relevance to communities in the developing world and, although the majority of articles in languages other than English remain intact, the English editions of these articles have had their oral citations removed. I ask why this happened, what the policy implications are for oral citations generally, and what steps can be taken in the future to respond to the problem that this project (and more recent versions of it https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Indigenous_Knowledge) set out to solve. This talk comes out of an ethnographic project in which I have interviewed some of the actors involved in the original oral citations project, including the majority of editors of the surr https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/surr article that I trace in a chapter of my PhD[1] http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=286.
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org