Hi Jodi, thanks for sharing this, I think it's a very interesting strand of research and one I have personally worked on in the past. There is a number of papers recently published or coming out on this topic, including: [1] Stvilia, B., Twidale, M. B., Smith, L. C., and Gasser, L. Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 6 (2008), 983–1001. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.163.5109&rep=r… [2] Lam, S. K., Karim, J., and Riedl, J. The Effects of Group Composition on Decision Quality in a Social Production Community. In GROUP ’10 (November 2010). http://www.grouplens.org/system/files/Lam+Wikipedia+Group+Discussion.pdf [3] Taraborelli, D., and Ciampaglia, G. L. Beyond notability. Collective deliberation on content inclusion in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops (SASOW 2010) (September 2010). http://nitens.org/docs/qteso10.pdf As part of [3] we conducted a small survey among top participants in AfD discussions, I can share the data with you if this is of any interest. To recruit editors for interviews it would be useful if you posted a short description of the project on Meta (see for example [3]) so the WMF Research Committee can help you find the best way to do so. [4] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research/Projects/Motivation_to_Contribute_t… Best, Dario On May 11, 2011, at 3:26 PM, Jodi Schneider wrote: Hello (and please pardon the crossposting), I am a Ph.D. researcher at the Digital Enterprise Research Institute in Galway, Ireland. My Ph.D. topic is online discussions, specifically the reasoning and arguments people use. I am currently studying Articles for Deletion in English Wikipedia, to understand how article deletion decisions are made. I am working on a prototype argument assistant to help newcomers understand what kinds of arguments make sense, much in the way that the Article Wizard provides guidance for creating an article. From reading discussions, I am learning what kinds of arguments people use in AfD, especially to see what comments advance the discussion. Next I need to get some perspectives from editors! I'm looking for Wikipedians to interview about the deletion process. I envision a 30 minute skype or phone conversation. I'm interested in learning about what works well in AfD discussions, any frustrations you have with it, and why you generally do or don't !vote in AfD. I hope to talk with Wikipedians with a wide variety of experience editing (from newcomers to EN-WP, to regular EN-WP editors, to admins, especially admins who close discussions), with people who spend little time commenting in deletion discussions, as well as those who do. Would you be willing to talk with me? Let me know the best times for you; you can reach me at jschneider(a)pobox.com or with the info below. -Jodi Schneider WP:Jodi.a.schneider skype:jodi.a.schneider http://jodischneider.com/jodi.html _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Dario Taraborelli, PhD Senior Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation http://wikimediafoundation.org http://nitens.org/taraborelli _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l