Regarding featured articles, I conducted a small study (should be out in
Oct.) on the Portuguese Wikipedia about those related to Ancient History.
Although the sample was obviously small, my findings were clear and
confirmed by many admins later: most articles are translations/new material
made by a very small group of frequent editors, who use their stats to
legitimate power as admins. Again here, cultural issues pair with specific
community behavior.
Great material, Dariusz, thanks for sharing!
Juliana
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Dariusz Jemielniak <darekj(a)alk.edu.pl>
wrote:
on a slightly related note, I analyzed the cultural
preferences for image,
references, links, word count etc. saturation in good and featured articles
on 8 wikis and found significant cultural variation:
http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/cultures%20of%20wikipedias.pdf
best,
dj
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM, Peter Meyer <econterms(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Interesting topic! Here is a useful analogy
regarding the distribution
of sizes. There has been study of how big cities are within countries or
worldwide, and there are recurring patterns of the scale of the largest
to
the second largest, and the second-largest to the
third, and so forth.
Without getting into this too deeply you might at least check if the size
relations among Wikipedias are like those of cities, that is, if they
have
a similar-looking distribution. If they do, the
underlying forces and
dynamics for city sizes might also apply to wikipediae or other sites.
The math is described by Zipf’s law and/or Gibrat’s distribution.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf%27s_law <https://en.wikipedia.org/
wiki/Zipf's_law>, and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibrat%27s_law <
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibrat's_law>law>. The work by Xavier Gabaix,
cited there, was my introduction to it.
Like the choice of what city to move to, the relevant Wikipedias for a
user will usually need to be “close” — geographically for a city, or to
the
languages the user knows for a Wikipedia. There
are other factors
driving
a user’s choice, if we think of the user as
choosing. If the user wishes
to study an obscure academic subject, they may have to use a large
wikipedia, and that drives them to also participate there. If the user
is
focused on a geographically local subject, that
drives the choice. A
larger wikipedia is more useful than a small one, therefore the
distribution of wikipedia sizes would be more unequal than the
distribution
of personal languages.
It sounds like, based on Poland and Korea, you can show that Internet
availability is not driving all the difference. Good to know. — peter
meyer
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 11:30 AM, James Salsman <jsalsman(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Why do you think different language
Wikipedia's have different
sizes, outside of the popularity of a given language?
Piotr, if you model organic editing production with a Poisson
distribution, which is reasonable for a first approximation, 3x+
disparities are just natural for the same population sizes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution
I'm not sure the images in that article capture the wide platykurtosis
of large Poisson distributions.
Best regards,
Jim
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
________________________________________________________
<http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/> prof. dr hab. Dariusz Jemielniak
kierownik katedry MINDS (Management in Networked and Digital Societies)
Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
http://NeRDS.kozminski.edu.pl <http://nerds.kozminski.edu.pl/>
*Ostatnie artykuły:*
- Dariusz Jemielniak, Maciej Wilamowski (2017) Cultural Diversity of
Quality of Information on Wikipedias
<http://crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/cultures%20of%20wikipedias.pdf>
*Journal
of the Association for Information Science and Technology* 68: 10.
2460–2470.
- Dariusz Jemielniak (2016) Wikimedia Movement Governance: The Limits
of A-Hierarchical Organization
<http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/wikimedia_governance.pdf>
*Journal
of Organizational Change Management *29: 3. 361-378.
- Dariusz Jemielniak, Eduard Aibar (2016) Bridging the Gap Between
Wikipedia and Academia
<http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/bridging.pdf> *Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology* 67: 7. 1773-1776.
- Dariusz Jemielniak (2016) Breaking the Glass Ceiling on Wikipedia
<http://www.crow.kozminski.edu.pl/papers/glass-ceiling.pdf> *Feminist
Review *113: 1. 103-108.
- Tadeusz Chełkowski, Peter Gloor, Dariusz Jemielniak (2016)
Inequalities
in Open Source Software Development: Analysis of Contributor’s Commits
in
Apache Software Foundation Projects
<http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=10.
1371%2Fjournal.pone.0152976.PDF>
, *PLoS ONE* 11: 4. e0152976.
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l