Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
---------------------------------
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com
On 22/01/07, Felipe Ortega glimmer_phoenix@yahoo.es wrote:
Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
Great work! The scientist in me is looking forward to seeing the statistical analyses you make of the project.
Felipe Ortega escribió:
Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
Wouldn't the page fit better on meta than on en.wiki?
Does Evolution in time section have images? It'd be interesting the number of articles evolution on pt: as they use bot creation quite a lot.
Agreed, Meta would be better.
Felipe-- would you consider writing a short summary on this for Signpost, the English Wikipedia's internal communication source, to explain this all in laymen's terms to the community?
Nick
On 1/22/07, Platonides Platonides@gmail.com wrote:
Felipe Ortega escribió:
Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
Wouldn't the page fit better on meta than on en.wiki?
Does Evolution in time section have images? It'd be interesting the number of articles evolution on pt: as they use bot creation quite a lot.
Nicholas Moreau wrote:
Agreed, Meta would be better.
Felipe-- would you consider writing a short summary on this for Signpost, the English Wikipedia's internal communication source, to explain this all in laymen's terms to the community?
Second, and note that some of the images have been tagged on Commons as not having sufficient information to be considered free (sigh, copyright paranoia strikes again... :( ).
I don't know what do you want to say with free...
I think I have uploaded all the images under the GNU-FDL license, so you can use them for free (as long as you credit the original author (me :-) ), and provide them under the same license....).
Felipe.
Piotr Konieczny piokon@post.pl escribió: Nicholas Moreau wrote:
Agreed, Meta would be better.
Felipe-- would you consider writing a short summary on this for Signpost, the English Wikipedia's internal communication source, to explain this all in laymen's terms to the community?
Second, and note that some of the images have been tagged on Commons as not having sufficient information to be considered free (sigh, copyright paranoia strikes again... :( ).
I have collected Wikipedia-related graphs and charts in a single category: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_charts Please note that there is also http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_statistics where those files should be moved from the en-Wiki category, meta http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_statistics and similar categories on other WikiMedia wikis (and their subcategories...).
Next on my agenda is to go through every page in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_statistics and create a short table of content.
I submitted a paper explaining in detail preliminar conclusions for ISSI 2007 Conference (currently pending of approval).
So it should be easy for me now to make a short summary about those and other new results on Signpost. Thanks for the idea, I'll try to create some spare time for that...
Saludos.
Felipe.
Nicholas Moreau nicholasmoreau@gmail.com escribió: Agreed, Meta would be better.
Felipe-- would you consider writing a short summary on this for Signpost, the English Wikipedia's internal communication source, to explain this all in laymen's terms to the community?
Nick
On 1/22/07, Platonides wrote:
Felipe Ortega escribió:
Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
Wouldn't the page fit better on meta than on en.wiki?
Does Evolution in time section have images? It'd be interesting the number of articles evolution on pt: as they use bot creation quite a lot.
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
---------------------------------
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com
Yes, I've just generated the images, but I still haven't had enough time to upload them.
You can check the page this weekend for the new updates, your feedback about ptwiki will be very interesting :- )
Well, I put the page on enwiki in the Wikipedia branch. I don't really know if that is the best place for it. However, I've also created a link to the enwiki page from statistics article on meta.
Platonides Platonides@gmail.com escribió: Felipe Ortega escribió:
Hi all.
Finally, the first upload of images created with WikiXRay is available:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiXRay
For next updates I'll try to use Commonist for faster upload of lots of files.
Any comments about the graphics are welcomed.
Saludos.
Felipe Ortega.
Wouldn't the page fit better on meta than on en.wiki?
Does Evolution in time section have images? It'd be interesting the number of articles evolution on pt: as they use bot creation quite a lot.
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
---------------------------------
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com
"As we can see, one common feature is that in each histogram we can identify two different populations. The lower half represents the tiny articles population, most probably composed by stubs. The higher half represents the standard articles population."
No. The lower half is redirects.
-- Alexander Sigachov http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:ajvol
Thanks! This is an important feedback.
I think in that half there is a mix of redirects, stubs and other tiny pages, but I'm still not quite sure about the % for each component.
So you mean redirects are the most important contribution in that side... Really interesting. I'll try a more in-depth analysis of those aspects.
Saludos.
Felipe.
ÐлекÑÐ°Ð½Ð´Ñ Ð¡Ð¸Ð³Ð°ÑÑв alexander.sigachov@gmail.com escribió: "As we can see, one common feature is that in each histogram we can identify two different populations. The lower half represents the tiny articles population, most probably composed by stubs. The higher half represents the standard articles population."
No. The lower half is redirects.
-- Alexander Sigachov http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/user:ajvol
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
---------------------------------
LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com
wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org