Jeremy Dunck wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/full/438900a.html http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/multimedia/438900a_m1.html http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/box/438900a_BX1.html
I hope they publish more detail about this study.
As I just wrote in my weblog http://wm.sieheauch.de/ the study is relatively poor. Good for Wikipedia but the sample is quite small and it's vague how the articles were choosen. I bet nature would not have accepted the research as a submited paper.
Greetings, Jakob