You could start a page on meta with subpages on specific wikis. I think you will find that a devolved system will work better than trying for a centralised system. People on the English Wikipedia running current schemes or aware of past ones might be willing to log them there, perhaps with a category, but I can't see them doing so on meta, and I doubt other languages will be different.
On Sunday, 19 July 2015, Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
OK, perhaps we should have one so that we know what's being tried and what has been tried. I'm not sure who to ask in WMF if they could set up a hub for this kind of work. Aaron, do you know?
Thanks,
Pine
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 2:13 PM, WereSpielChequers < werespielchequers@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','werespielchequers@gmail.com');> wrote:
No.
There is a wiki project that looks at this and many chapters, as well as I suspect many adhoc things that individual editors do. I know of enough such initiatives to know that there is no single complete list of editor retention initiatives.
Regards
Jonathan
On 19 Jul 2015, at 15:03, Pine W <wiki.pine@gmail.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wiki.pine@gmail.com');> wrote:
Interesting. Is there a comprehensive list somewhere of ongoing and planned editor retention initiatives?
Pine
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org'); https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org'); https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l