Thanks both!
I'm specifically looking at Wikidata's coverage, rather than Wikipedia's - in other words, work done on deficiencies in the mapping of wikimedia content onto wikidata content.
On 8 April 2015 at 07:19, Flöck, Fabian Fabian.Floeck@gesis.org wrote:
Hi Oliver,
from the top of my head, two on gender coverage: the one Max just sent around: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/777/631 and another one, with a different approach, but a similar goal: http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.06307
We had one on diversity that also has a small section about representativeness of the editor base, although it might not be exactly what you are looking for: http://journal.webscience.org/432/1/112_paper.pdf
Gruß, Fabian
On 07.04.2015, at 21:50, Oliver Keyes okeyes@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hey all,
Is anyone aware of research on the completeness of Wikidata, in terms of coverage and systemic bias? This seems like the sort of thing Max Klein might know ;). Papers, blog posts, anything.
-- Oliver Keyes Research Analyst Wikimedia Foundation
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Cheers, Fabian
-- Fabian Flöck Research Associate Computational Social Science department @GESIS Unter Sachsenhausen 6-8, 50667 Cologne, Germany Tel: + 49 (0) 221-47694-208 fabian.floeck@gesis.org
www.gesis.org www.facebook.com/gesis.org
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l