Hi Pine,
Haifeng has a simple question about how to sample editors other than via dumps. It would be great if someone who knows the answer to help them to move forward.
If you are interested to learn more about their research, instead of answering their question, my recommendation would be to start the conversation with: "can you tell us more about your research?" kind of question. I find the current way of communication very speculative, and that is not good for making a vibrant research community that can help us address some of our big questions.
Best, Leila
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:08 PM Pine W wiki.pine@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, can you expand on what you mean by "sample"? If you're referring to analyzing users' edit histories then that should be fine. However, if you're planning to send surveys or messages to them, sending them barnstars, or otherwise manipulating their on-wiki experience, that would be problematic.
Pine ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine )
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:19 PM Haifeng Zhang haifeng1@andrew.cmu.edu wrote:
Hi folks,
My work needs to randomly sample new editors in each month, e.g., 100 editors per month.
Do any of you have good suggestions for how to do this efficiently?
I could think of using the dump files, but wonder are there other options?
Thanks,
Haifeng Zhang _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l