On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote:
what? then a lot of wikipedia articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}})
Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such.
Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for your interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my suggestion would bring.