Hoi, If this stands on its own, ok. It does not, it is part and parcel of the bias you find in English Wikipedia. Informing about one case does not negate even address the obsession with rules. Thanks, GerardM
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 02:03, Aron Demian aronmanning5@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 21:49, Joe Corneli holtzermann17@gmail.com wrote:
This section fills in some of the gaps left by the statement: "It is not only people who do not care for rules, it is also the people who obsess about rules." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarice_Phelps#Wikipedia_article
A little history: Clarice Phelps is notable both as a scientist and for being deleted from Wikipedia as non-notable :-), which resulted in significant media coverage. The admin "Rama" tried to "do the right thing" in the wrong manner by restoring the article and - without supporters - lost his tools:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Locus...
Demian (Aron) _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l