I don’t think userboxes are the best thing to use as evidence for any claim
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) nwilson@wikimedia.org wrote:
See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Health/Mental and semi-related https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Personality plus the essays
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obsessive%E2%80%93compulsive_disorde...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:High-functioning_autism_and_Asperger... (plus the French and Chinese Wikipedia's equivalent pages for that second essay, which likely have different content)
Sidenote: I worry about those userboxes, for the same reasons mentioned in this thread. I wonder if there ought to be a warning at the top of that listing-page, reminding editors to be careful... [but userboxes are a complicated can of worms, and it's probably been discussed before, so I won't wade into it.]
--Quiddity _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l