Thanks for your reply, Kerry. I meant any kind of quality improvement.
Some mechanisms may target specific type of editors, and others might be quite general.
Best,
Haifeng Zhang
Postdoctoral Research Fellow Human-Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ________________________________ From: Wiki-research-l wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org on behalf of Kerry Raymond kerry.raymond@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:16:12 PM To: 'Research into Wikimedia content and communities' Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Ways thru which articles could attract editors
"Article quality" is quite a wide topic. I would imagine most good faith contributors believe they are improving the quality of an article with every edit. Do you have some specific type of quality improvement in mind? E.g. more citations, more content, fewer spelling errors?
Kerry
-----Original Message----- From: Wiki-research-l [mailto:wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Haifeng Zhang Sent: Sunday, 28 April 2019 7:53 AM To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Ways thru which articles could attract editors
Dear folks,
I wonder what are those mechanisms/events (in Wikipedia or WikiProjects) which may attract editors to improve article quality.
One example is Today's articles for improvement. Within WikipProjects, GA/FA nominations seem useful too.
Thanks,
Haifeng Zhang _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l