Here's another possibly relevant article: http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Wikipedia_and_lesser-resourced_languages
~ Chitu
-------- Message original -------- Sujet: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Introduction and a simple question De : Chitu Okoli Chitu.Okoli@concordia.ca Pour : wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org Date : 6 Septembre 2012 09:29:32
Hi Hrafn,
On WikiLit, there is a topic category called "Cultural and linguistic effects on participation": http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Category:Cultural_and_linguistic_effects_on.... Some of the articles listed there would probably be valuable to you, such as:
- New technologies and terminological pressure in lesser-used languages : the Breton Wikipedia, from terminology consumer to potential terminology provider http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/New_technologies_and_terminological_pressure_in_lesser-used_languages_:_the_Breton_Wikipedia,_from_terminology_consumer_to_potential_terminology_provider
- Issues of cross-contextual information quality evaluation-the case of Arabic, English, and Korean Wikipedias http://wikilit.referata.com/wiki/Issues_of_cross-contextual_information_quality_evaluation-the_case_of_Arabic,_English,_and_Korean_Wikipedias
~ Chitu
Hrafn H Malmquist a écrit :
Good day everyone
My name is Hrafn Malmquist, I am an Icelandic student of library and information science at the University of Iceland, writing a master's thesis on the Icelandic Wikipedia (http://is.wikipedia.org) which I have personally actively contributed to for about six years (http://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notandi:Jabbi). It has currently 34,478 articles and a very active user base of probably less than 30 users. My approach is wholistic, recounting the general history of Wikipedia, the Icelandic Wikipedia, the statistical development and possibly conduct interviews with contributing users.
Any pointers on interesting research - especially with regard to small language communities - would be well appriciated.
In searching for sources on the general history of Wikipedia, the best overview I found is Andrew Lih's The Wikipedia Revolution (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Revolution). I find it to be interesting but incomplete and rather sloppy when it comes to citing sources. He should have finished it off with more care. Does anyone know of a better alternative?
Best regards, Hrafn
Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l