Libraries already do this for us. At least mine does. There is a health database, for example. It was not what I was looking for. I was looking for a book summarizing the role of elements and vitamins, their greatest natural sources, manufacturing, their purpose in animals --had it in 1996-- quite a bit more interesting than Earl Mindell. Stuff like that is probably in the database, and it is nothing I can sit down and try to remember and then find support for. I probably could not read the whole database now at the library in my lifetime. _______ You can find about 135 hits in pubmed from a search on [[white cabbage ulcer]]. Red cabbage lends a more appealing colour to pineapple smoothies, and the pineapple's flavour completely overpowers the cabbage. Research on cabbage juice obscures the benefit of fibre in a recipe for morning sickness.
"stevertigo" stvrtg@gmail.com wrote in message news:7c402e010903121355h52b76b4ev72bf200b9a0b441@mail.gmail.com...
There was some discussion recently about WikiMedia paying for user accounts on proprietary source engines, to aid in providing sources to Wikipedia articles. I'm curious as to how that inquiry was dealt with, and how it was resolved.
Seems like a good idea. If feasible, there would presumably be a limited number of assigned accounts given to specific interested users, who would have to commit themselves to assisting others in sourcing particular concepts, statements, and phrases. A common case may be where the Wikipedia author may be writing from knowledge, or may be referencing an inferior source, and can't directly quote from a superior or particular text because it is not readily available to them.
-SV
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l