On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
[Ken had written:]
It does NOT have to be negative in order for it
to be removed.
"Contentious"
Like "consensus", "contentious" is not defined by a single editor
objecting.
So you're seriously suggesting that the line about him being a director
should *not* have been removed, even though there was no source for it and
he sincerely objected to it?
One of the meta-messages of this thread is that we ought not
to extremify everything, ought not to constantly apply rigid
one-size-fits-all cookie-cutter thinking.
Will is seriously suggesting that the line did not have to be
removed immediately.