2008/10/22 Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net>et>:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
Can you explain more clearly which parts of what
you posted you consider to
be issues?
If our policy demands that someone corrects errors about themselves by
getting the correct information published in a secondary source first, that
policy is broken.
Except the information in this case isn't actually correct. The person
may not consider themselves a director any more but if you were
writing their oblitory it would be legitimate to state that they had
been a director.
--
geni