On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Elias Friedman <elipongo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I agree as well. A year should be linked in its first
appearance in the
article-
[snip]
Why the *first* appearance? We've been able to link into sections
for a long time, there are many articles I've read whos intros I've
probably never seen. Do you never become curious about some date on
the Nth occurrence rather than the first?