On Oct 7, 2008, at 5:54 PM, geni wrote:
2008/10/7 Philip Sandifer
<snowspinner(a)gmail.com>om>:
> That was always the core of the issue with spoiler warnings - they
> made articles worse, not better.
Unproven. Spoiler warnings had the advantage that people actually
put
in some spoilers.
They also organized articles around hiding spoilers. But more
importantly, spoiler warnings just looked stupid. In a fundamental
sense, they looked non-serious.
-Phil
So does having edit histories with names like snowspinner in them.