On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Thomas Dalton wrote:
Is this the same David Gerard that not only spearheaded the drive but even personally removed spoiler warnings...
There is a big difference between a quality warning and a spoiler warning.
Wasn't one of the rationales for taking out spoiler warnings that it was original research to decide that something is a spoiler? Wouldn't it be original research to determine something's quality too?
That's not a rationale I heard.
It is, however, a rationale heard from David Gerard.
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/htdig/wikien-l/2007-December/087538.html
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
We already do have in a way quality warnings, all the editorial warnings at the top of articles in a way say this article is still in progress. (those that say more sources needed, copyedit needed, etc).
We also rank articles by "quality" when wikiprojects do their article classes. In theory an "A" class article is better then a "B" class article, etc.