2008/10/7 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro(a)gmail.com>om>:
David Gerard wrote:
2008/10/7 Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>et>:
Template:Incomplete adds "This article or
section is incomplete and may
require expansion and/or cleanup.
Please improve the article, or discuss the issue on the talk page." It
adds articles to Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification
Something like that should be fine. Readers seem to like that we have
quality warnings where appropriate.
- d.
Whoa, when did you sell out?
Is this the same David Gerard that not only spearheaded
the drive but even personally removed spoiler warnings...
There is a big difference between a quality warning and a spoiler warning.
You want us to be in the business of telling people
when
precisely they should be on guard (and by the omission
be lulled into not thinking critically) for the article not
being all that can be said about a subject. Where the heck
are all those warnings in the EB Micropaedia articles?
Suddenly we're not allowed to improve upon EB?
"The readers like.." Eh? Since when is
"The readers like..."
a valid argument for anything. And no, don't tell me. I know
full well when it was, and it won't serve anyone to rehash it.
Ok, change "like" to "get something out of". The point still stands.