Anthony wrote:
Why would someone be *glad* that it's not obvious who wrote an article? What rational reason could there possibly be for such a position? I'll grant that in some situations it might be rational to give away your work for free and without attribution, but to be *glad* specifically *because* you are not attributed, I don't see how that can possibly be considered a moral position within the framework of Objectivism.
Me, I wasn't claiming any moral position within the framework of Objectivism. It's more like a [[Random act of kindness]]. (But yes, part of the silly, delicious little thrill is precisely that the recipient will never know who his benefactor is. Whether this is rational or not I won't say.)