On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:03 AM, xaosflux xaosflux@gmail.com wrote:
As to the inline signing v.s. mime attachments, the former is much easier to deal with, though the attachments are less likely to get corrupted.
It is only easier to deal with when:
1) The sender does not have a user-agent capable of attaching signatures, or 2) The receiver does not have a mechanism to check such signatures.
Both of which, with the exception of web mail systems, should not be issues today.