If my intention was to run around that decision...
- Wouldn't it be easier for me to let time do its job and allow the case to be forgotten? - Would it not be easier for me to get a new account to avoid the remedies? - This is something Davenbelle done several times with four large accounts.
Please answer those two questions above. And then consider the ones below.
Do you realize how non-plausible your argument is? Why do you work so hard to assume bad faith?
- White Cat
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, having just re-read White Cat's 3rd email to this thread, it seems the deleted redirect WAS of the form [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/XXX]]. So what makes you think anyone has a problem with WP:RFAR/ redirects?
That was one problem. The other problem was that White Cat's suggestion that the case "Cool Cat, Davenbelle and Stereotek" be renamed to "Davenbelle" was rejected, mainly because there were several remedies in the case specifically referring to him, and now he wants to create a redirect of the form "Davenbelle". You can see how one comes to the conclusion that he's trying to run around that decision not to rename the case.
-- Stephen Bain stephen.bain@gmail.com
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l