There are moments you know you've gained acceptance by the Establishment.
I have been sent a copy of last year's Microeconomics finals paper from the University of Oxford, where we find the quite marvellous:
---
SECTION A: THEORETICAL
Q 2. "Should Wikipedia be taxed or subsidised"?
----
Note the complete lack of any *definitions*. Whoever set the paper clearly treats the existence of Wikipedia as a simple fact of basic knowledge, and assumes their students all have a rough idea of what it is and how it works...