http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=1208&u_sid=10325513
This article uses the headline "1995 bio still the Wikipedia on Warren", but isn't actually about Wikipedia in any way; it's apparently regarding "Wikipedia" as a generic term for a "source to check dates, names and events". While this is a much more positive thing than if "Wikipedia" were being used as a generic term for "an unreliable source that can be screwed up by any idiot on the street" as some of the critics would be likely to do, it still possibly poses a threat to the Wikipedia trademark; just like Google's lawyers are concerned about the widespread use of "googling" especially if it threatens to become a term for online searching even when the Google brand search engine is not used, it could cause 'genericide' of the WP trademark if (as I've seen in other places occasionally) "wikipedia" becomes a common term for reference sources and online projects of various sorts, like "the wikipedia of baseball statistics".