-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
WJhonson@aol.com wrote: | | In a message dated 3/30/2008 11:54:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, | ffm@intserverror.com writes: | | But would it be accepted as proof that there was activity on said bridge?>> | | | | -------------- | Of course not. | We could not independently verify when the picture was taken :) | | | | **************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL | Home. | (http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15&ncid=aolh...) | _______________________________________________ | WikiEN-l mailing list | WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org | To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: | https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l "However, some argue that the bridge has reopened. (link to someone's blog)".
After all, if poor sources are better than none, and if nobody challenges that information...
Or would this be the best neutral wording: "As of <date>, the bridge was reported to be closed".
- -FFM