On 13/03/2008, Sage Ross <sage.ross(a)yale.edu> wrote:
Whoa! Undue weight governs coverage within individual
articles, and
has no bearing on whether a topic should have an article. Wiki is not
paper, really. (And even paper coverage greatly exceeds Wikipedia's
current coverage on almost any given topic, in aggregate.)
You're strictly correct. OTOH isn't this somewhat equivalent to
arguing that it's perfectly OK to remove something from an article (or
even lots of articles if they all mention it) on NPOV grounds, and
then turn around and make an article especially for it?
-ragesoss
--
-Ian Woollard
We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. If we lived in a perfectly
imperfect world things would be a lot better.