Where's this focus you speak of?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Martijn Hoekstra < martijnhoekstra@gmail.com> wrote:
I am not entirely sure. You focus on a few articles, to maximise the effect of a small group can have on a project. It does sound a little pointy.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 6:59 PM, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:56 PM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/03/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/03/2008, George Herbert george.herbert@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com
wrote:
Kurt and David, you have been reported to AN/I for disruption
and
canvassing!
...and promptly told that this was entirely proper by at least
two
people
including me.
Indeed. If the reaction of AFD regulars to the prospect of the community they work in the name of actually *showing up* is to "report" people to ANI ...
This list is not the community. AFD regulars seem to have no problem with random members of the community dropping if for random AFD debates. What they tend to object to is coordinated campaigns which going by past experience is not an unreasonable worry.
A point I made on-wiki...
If we were intervening on a specific AFD poll only, this would be
canvassing
and improper.
We're not doing that. We're concerned about the process, and
intervening in
a general manner.
This is entirely proper operation of the community. The analogy with canvassing is false.
-- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com _______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l