On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:17 PM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:13 AM, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
....
subscribe to SciFinder. There are nearly always
specific provisions in
the contract (not just for SciFinder, but for most databases and
journals) that say who can get access to the data -- for instance,
only the faculty, staff and students of a university. Obviously
enough, the many glorious readers of Wikipedia are unlikely to fall
into this faculty/staff/student classification.
Assuming this is true for most contracts they sign, then probably
anyone systematically posting data from one of these systems is
violating some provision of their contract. This doesn't have anything
to do with copyright law per se, but it is a terms of use question.
Er, and I didn't actually look at the chemistry page to see what all
folks were proposing to do. As Ec & David Goodman and others have
said, CAS numbers are available from lots and lots of sources, so
simply reprinting the things -- rather than trying to get a lot of
them downloaded/validated through SciFinder -- doesn't seem too bad.
I'd be curious how things like the CRC handbook get them, actually. Do
they have to license their use from CAS?
-- phoebe