On 09/03/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Generally, well referenced articles don't get deleted at AfD. So, it isn't like we're losing our best content here. The WQA on David is a bit ridiculous, though, and the criticism from an admin that "you've been an editor since 2004, you should know better!" doesn't seem calculated to actually do any good. Etiquette police... When was the last MfD for WP:WQA?
Notice also the complete refusal to address the question "so how would you phrase severely defective judgement on the part of a nominator?" Said severely defective judgement being much of the problem with AFD.
This is going to take interested parties diving in. This means you.
Usually "I disagree with the nominator for reasons X Y Z".