If everyone of the 10,000 or so active editors commented on one afd a week on a topic they were not personally involved in (in addition of course to whatever hey were) we'd have about 10 neutral comments on each proposal, which would give a much clearer view of true consensus.
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 2:34 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/03/2008, Judson Dunn cohesion@sleepyhead.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 9:03 AM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
Participate. This is like shovelling through sewage, but the only way to get the attitude changed is to get in there. Got a spare half an hour today?
I guess that really is the only way, sadly enough, ha. All our mailing list agreement won't mean much to the people that work it every day and don't read this. :) I'll do some work this week I promise. Maybe this can be the start of a big change in Notability! :D
And remember: it appears most AFD nominators are quite unable to tell disagreement from a personal attack. See my talk page. So always include "Not to at all question the nominator's sincerity or good faith, but ..." when someone's done something so stupid you can hardly believe it.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l