On Mar 8, 2008, at 12:22 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 08/03/2008, Philip Sandifer snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
IANAL, so I'm not about to interpret any of these fascinating tidbits, though it does suggest that the straightforward scholarly non-profit source using another scholarly non-profit source argument might be a little weaker than it had initially seemed, given that CAS numbers seem to be used primarily in industrial settings.
If they're really suing people over using other numberings, then I, and I suspect many others, shall just have acquired a new hobby. The Scientologists have lost anyway.
Oh, if they're doing that, fuck 'em.
-Phil