David Gerard wrote:
On 04/03/2008, Screamer scream@datascreamer.com wrote:
How does this relate to the English Wikipedia? This is really OT for the list, try foundation-l.
The project relevance is the question of the [[Rachel Marsden]] BLP complaints (Ms Marsden has complained about past versions), which is how they met. And Jimbo is a frequent first contact for famous people with a BLP problem - though in practice info@wikimedia.org is precisely as effective - and his role in such is valuable to the project, so making sure that's clear is a relevant project concern.
(His blog statement says he has taken care not to cross the streams on this one, FWIW. The same expectation would apply to any experienced BLP editor - if you get to know the subject of an article personally, you would be expected not to do a BLP cleanup on it.)
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I stand corrected then. It is not always easy for one to parse a blog entry for relevance, I would ask that in the future; relevance be made known in the post wherever a link of that nature is posted, so it is clear. I hope I'm not the only one who needed spoon feeding this time. But... I could be.
Are there any real concerns here? If so, I would be most ecstatic to discuss them.
./scream