In a message dated 3/2/2008 4:37:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, dgerard@gmail.com writes:
Mind you, I suspect 200 a day or 1000 a day or whatever (I would *guess* the latter is getting close to the rate of crap uploads, but anyway) would lead to *more* deletion, as the backlog is much more human-reviewable.>>
------------------------------------ By the way, I believe BC has already implemented, or said-he-would-implement a limit on the tagging rate.
And I have no problem with more deletion, provided there is a reasonable time spent in human review.
However I, and others, expressed concern, that this was unlikely given the extreme back load. When deletions take place, for a single admin, at the rate of 50 per minute, we can guarantee that reasonable review was not done. That is what we want to avoid going forward yes.
But in addition, some of the deletions which *were* done, now need to be reviewed and undone, as being probable borderline cases.
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)