D, I did provide a particular case where the use of the Non-free policy created a quite silly result.
Other than Geni who seems to be trying out for the debating society (that's a joke!), no one has really presented any reasonable argument that would both: A) enhance the project and B) address this specific case.
And by reasonable, I don't tendentious and extreme interpretation's of Nonfree.
We *want to encourage* authors and artists to add their content to the project. That enhances the project. Creating bureaucratic nightmares for them isn't really helping us to help them. And we end up with people, otherwise believing in us, leaving because we make it so difficult.
Could you address, specifically and directly the case of Ben Patrick Johnson that I recently mentioned. Trying to make everyone only add free content, ignores the fact that we are allowed to add fair use content. So what I'd like to see is an example where this book cover could be added, under fair use content. Arguing that it should be added only as a free image isn't going to address my concerns that new fair-use images are being unfairly targeted for deletion.
Will Johnson
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)