Or look at this case I just wandered across today _http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ben_Patrick_Johnson&diff=18812... oldid=188120374_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ben_Patrick_Johnson&diff=18812...)
It should be fairly obvious that the *author* of a work, is trying to display a picture of that work. This man is, in fact the author.
It was speedy-deleted for "invalid fair-use" ? Excuse me? That's awfully tendentious editing.
"He was notified 48 hours ago..." I suppose no one noticed that he hasn't in fact been editing for a month. Supreme silliness. But even this example, I'm sure will get reactions of the person "was just doing their job."
I suppose it's too hard to just edit the fair use rationale to say the author of the work can certainly display their own work if they want.
Will Johnson
**************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duf... 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)