On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 06:01 -0500, SlimVirgin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.net wrote:
You're right, Luna. There is real pathology at work here. And everyone, by buying into it, is enabling the dysfunctional behavior to continue. There are two persons I never argue with: a patient, and a person who clearly needs to be one.
Marc Riddell
Marc is pissed off with me because I defended Jimbo on this list a few months ago. That, apparently, set me beyond the pale.
Try because you're annoying just about everyone on the list.
If you think there's an abuse of the privacy policy, make an official complaint to the Ombudsman Commission. If you think the offence is an abuse of CheckUser policy other than a violation of the privacy policy, make an official complaint to ArbCom, or rather, contribute to the current ongoing requests. If you think the CU policy need tightening, dis-ambiguated, or whatever, propose a change to the policy on wiki.
Continuously making allegations that either cannot be defended without explicitly violating privacy, or at best is your word against their word is helpful. What was the original issue over now? Lar and CU use and leak of results / logs. We have now added (by various sides) KM, WR, SWB abuse, jajgy oversight, .... My word, who would have guessed at the beginning of this thread! *rolleyes*
Let it drop. Continuously smearing different and increasing number of people by playing the victim that everyone in the world want to attack, without no solid evidence to back it up, or shown actual desire to resolving the issues by going through conflict resolution channels is getting boring, and doing yourself no favour.
KTC
p.s. Don't bother looking to see if you can attack me as well. I have never interact with you before. I am not pissed off with anyone because they are or are not worshipping Jimbo. I have never posted to WR, much less regularly read it, although I registered an account after the end of this year board election so that I can defend myself against one individual unfounded implication that because I modified the software for the election, and share a similar (in English) name, was why Ting won the eventual election. That was shot down by everyone else on there while my account was in the approval queue. I don't have access to deleted contrib (i.e. not admin), much less information like ArbCom-l, CU logs, oversights logs etc. I am identified to the foundation, although a quick google search (with my freely available name) would reveal more about me than that copy of my identification.