On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
Works are acceptable as sources for themselves.>>
Yes but our policy does address specifically articles that are mostly, or mainly referenced from primary sources. We don't like them. We want the article to have been interesting enough to have already been published by reliable, secondary, third-party .... etc.
Building an article based entirely or even mostly or mainly on primary sources is frowned upon.
Because the name Tessaiga comes from a primary source doesn't mean the entire article is mostly from primary sources.