Probably would only matter to the truly stupid abusers; it's not like the
smart ones don't know how to evade detection anyway.
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Carl Beckhorn <cbeckhorn(a)fastmail.fm>
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 02:27:28PM -0700, Josh Gordon
wrote:
A reason is logged, if it is provided. I'll
admit I don't enter a reason
for a lot of the cases that I process that involve, for example, Grawp
socks.
I would be interested to know the opinions of active checkusers on
whether reveaing to an abuser that some account had been checked might
allow the abuser to evade detection later. That is the main concern
I have about routinely revealing to a user that a check has been made.
- Carl
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l