On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Ken Arromdee <arromdee(a)rahul.net> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 WJhonson(a)aol.com wrote:
Ok so he says that the katakana, hiragana, etc.
transliteration is
unambiguous, and all I have to do to counter that is to say, "No, it's actually
ambiguous".
We don't demand sources for how to count to 2 or how to look up Morse code,
simply because someone says "no, I don't believe that" and claims that
saying so makes it into a dispute that needs a source. A dispute is at
minimum a *sincere* disagreement, not simply a way of using a rule to make
people jump through hoops.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
However, it is rather an assumption of bad faith to state that a
dispute is -not- sincere. It really is pretty clear-if the material is
likely to be challenged, or -is in practice challenged-, source it. If
it's really blatantly obvious, sourcing will take all of five seconds.
With some very simple searches, I can source that the Earth is round,
orbits the sun, and that the chemical formula for water is H2O. If you
have to argue about sourcing it, it's probably not as obvious as you
thought to begin with, and then it really -is- good to go find a
source. If it's that blatantly obvious, you'll find a source quickly.
--
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.