I think we should just invite some journalist to do it.
On Jan 23, 2008 10:56 AM, Nick heligolandwp@googlemail.com wrote:
It would be nice to have a bot that goes through their article and our article on one subject, looking for different sources and references, that would be something useful for both sites, I think.
Nick
On 23/01/2008, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/01/2008, Steven Walling steven.walling@gmail.com wrote:
I see the post didn't mention the 5,000th article in question.
Citizendium
is one of the few big wikis where I haven't poked around and
registered
for
an account (actually, probably the only one). This makes me wonder if
they
are living up to their goals. Is it 5,000 GA and/or FA quality
articles,
like they profess they are going to build better than Wikipedia? Or is
it
5,000 total, with lots of schlock thrown in?
We should go through those 5000 articles, and compare them to the corresponding Wikipedia articles. (It would be good if we can get an independent body to do a sample of them too.) We should try and make sure our articles on subjects covered by Citizendium are at least as good as theirs - call it friendly rivalry. ;)
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- Nick http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nick _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l