http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adult-child_sex...
This AfD raises a number of interesting questions for Wikipedia -
* How does Wikipedia handle pedophilia related articles? Haphazardly, in a coordinated way, not at all?
* Is there a method for protecting editors from the sort of exposition that goes on at sites like Wikisposure.com?
* Can we reasonably expect an article like this that appears to be a POV-fork to become sufficiently referenced and erudite such that it isn't a magnet for pedophilia POV-warriors?
* In the past, self-identified pedophiles have been banned immediately based only on that identification. Now that they have learned to not self-out (as evidenced by some of the diffs linked to on the Wikisposure page) is there a 'next step' for dealing with tendentious editing on this issue?
* The Pedophilia Article Watch (might be messing up the name) is essentially a research group that seeks out and counters pro-pedophilia or seemingly pro-pedophilia articles and article edits (I think). This is obviously a POV-based project, but it represents a POV that I think few would disagree with. Still, what is the status of a project like this?
Interested to hear a spectrum of opinions about this,
Nathan