The reason that constitution was rejected - or a major reason among many - is that it was hundreds of pages long and endlessly convoluted, to the point where it would take centuries of litigation to really determine what anything meant. The obvious conclusion for others interested in writing 'constitutions' or governing documents is that it should be broadly construed and short. This, it turns out, isn't all that hard to do.
Regarding this particular incident, the time for re-evaluating the implementation of rollback and the process for future similar changes is now. I would like to see someone, anyone, take some leadership here. There is a reason that societies are hierarchical - without leadership, nothing gets done.
Nathan