On 12/01/2008, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/01/2008, Earle Martin
<wikipedia(a)downlode.org> wrote:
It amounts to exactly the same thing.
Not at all. The foundation can always tell arbcom that they need to do
more to show community consensus.
ArbCom's decisions come after very careful consideration by very smart
people. If they ask the Foundation (nicely, as David notes) to make
the developers do something, it will happen. Why would the Foundation
refuse? They may come back and say "show community consensus", as you
say, but it is extremely unlikely that ArbCom will make a decision
that does not reflect consensus. It would *be* shown, and in the end,
what they ask for will be done.
--
Earle Martin
http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/