On Jan 11, 2008 12:22 AM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 12:12 AM, James Farrar james.farrar@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/01/2008, doc doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
And another poll:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_rollback/Vote
Of course, it could be argued that the description of one of the options as "the current status quo" is misleading...
I had the same concern so I changed it to "The behavior since [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Rollback_consensus|a disputed change]] on Wednesday." .. Which I think is more factual.
::sigh:: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_rollback/Vo...
Then again, the whole thing got blanked and people are now edit warring over it. Someone even edited my vote at some point (I can't be bothered to look and see who). The page was blanked then meta-blanked.
Just freeking fantastic.