On Jan 10, 2008 11:23 AM, Majorly axel9891@googlemail.com wrote:
On 10/01/2008, Chris Howie cdhowie@gmail.com wrote:
All the better to weed out the edit warriors.
Eugh. AGF please! A four day old editor wouldn't even know the meaning of edit war, let alone what they were doing. It's not their fault the tool would be forced upon them.
I didn't mean block off the bat. We'd handle it the same way we handle any other type of vandalism. Revert and warn. If it keeps happening, block.
Yes it does, there would not be another tier of user between editors and Jimbo.
There would be a "tier", those with rollback. It's the same, except they aren't granted it.
... what?
{{fact}}
How is that approach any different from how we let anons edit most of
our
pages?
This is about rollback, not editing in general. Rollback is a more powerful tool than the edit button.
I disagree. Edit lets you do anything. Rollback lets you do one specific thing.